Gang stalking case study: What is “child sacrifice” and “child abuse rings” in the gang stalking dialectic?

By the time little Christopher Bowen was saved from several near death experiences, he was eight years old, and had been bundled to the doctor over 320 times during the first eight years of his life. But only one person went to jail, while other child loving, “smooth criminals” walked free.

“How do you do 13 surgeries? How do you do it?” he asked. “How do you do 13 surgeries and not question the fifth surgery? The sixth surgery?”

By the time the authorities caught up with the child abuse ring that had been using him and exploiting him for money, little Christopher had been sliced, impaled, and sewn back together so many times by his abusers that he had suffered near death experiences.

By the time the authorities caught up with this ring of child abusers, it was almost by accident, as his abuse had been taking place in plain sight of doctors, and others in the medical system who allowed the activity to continue, against the evidence.

Here is a little more about that from “The Root:”

Christopher was placed on oxygen full-time and fitted for a feeding tube—a device that led to “multiple life-threatening blood infections,” wrote the Dallas Star-Telegram in a 2017 article. Christopher occasionally used a wheelchair and was placed in hospice care; at one point his mother once tried to get him on a lung transplant list. None of the procedures were necessary.

All across America, every day, it is true: child abuse rings operate in plain sight of the “authorities,” and as is stated frequently online and off, the authorities are indeed “in on it,” from the federal to the state, to the local level. Indeed, these rings are HUGE. Hundreds of billions of dollars huge. Social workers, psychologists, and their “woo peddling” police allies are throat deep in speakingg false narratives.

Read This: How the USA became the worlds leading child pornography distributer. What caused USpolice. intelligence agencies, and other persons and political groups to distribute child pornography? How do they get away with it?

But they are not what you would think of as a “ring of child abusers” because the media and mainstream narrative in their favor is massively funded, and operating in every institution across America. Let’s look a bit deeper into the bizarre reverse language of the gang stalking dialectic to dissect it for a few clues as to who these “rings” of people who just “love children” are–and to understand how psychologists and psychology are also complicit in “false memory” creation, and misdiagnoses.

Here’s more about little Christopher Bowen, from KHOU11 which reported the story from Texas at the time it was breaking:

Mom arrested after son’s 323 hospital visits, 13 surgeries

Kaylene Bowen-Wright is in the Dallas County Jail on an injury to a child charge. Her bail is set at $150,000. She declined an interview request.

Christopher’s father, Ryan Crawford, says her arrest was a long time coming. He’s angry that it took so long for the system to finally believe that Christopher’s mother was lying about illnesses.

“How do you do 13 surgeries? How do you do it?” he asked. “How do you do 13 surgeries and not question the fifth surgery? The sixth surgery?”

Investigators think the case is one of Munchausen syndrome by proxy, a mental disorder in which a caregiver makes up an illness or injury to get medical care.

“They doctor shop and hospital shop,” says Dr. Marc Feldman, a nationally recognized expert on the disorder. “They often frequent many emergency rooms over a wide geographic area. One doctor may never know that medical procedures or diagnostic tests have already been performed elsewhere, so it happens again and again and again.”

Also note the number 13 too, likely a coincidental number which you can compare to the following example, where the 13 is a not coincidental usage of that number, or read more about how this involves ROGS Analysis of gang stalking. Indeed this is a world wide operation, and without any doubt, it is linked.

SO, to explain more in detail what these “pedophile rings* are, it’s imprtant to look at a few terms, like “medical mafia,” and “child kidnapping,” and then, “child abuse” and “child sacrifice” too.

Here is one example of how gang stalkers obsess over and use the term child sacrifice, and a short explanation of why they do it, but since the Satanic Panic era, we have thousands of examples to choose from, all of which are related to hoaxes and lies from actual hoaxers and liars, many of whom were outed in the mainstream press, but not after creating massive damage to individuals., especially our societies most vulnerable, our children.

Also unsurprising is that they have deep ties to drugs and schizophrenia and actual CIA funded :human experimentation,” at the height of the CIAs notorious :mind control” era too, which verifiably DID use children and others as non-consenting guinea pigs.

But that’s what these people do–their lies and hoaxes kidnap entire generations of children, and their medical mafia’s in medicine and psychology cover for each other, generation after generation. But what is a “medical mafia” anyways? For that, we must look outside of this one story, at the case of how Americans became addicted to the fake heroin branded and marketed to American’s and others all around the world, called Oxycodon.

Here is a glimpse of the medical mafia, from PBS— and notice how they manage to pump the philanthropy angle in the first breath, a standard trick of the public relations industry, which is a magia in its own right:

The Sackler family is one of the richest families in America, donating millions to some of the world’s most prestigious museums and universities.

But the source of that wealth was for many years something of a mystery. Some members of the Sackler family own Purdue Pharma, the company that makes and markets OxyContin, the addictive painkiller considered one of the initial sparks for the nation’s opioid crisis, a crisis that has already left more than 450,000 Americans dead, and continues today.

William Brangham talks with the author of a new book that sheds light on this secretive dynasty.

The author of the book, Patrick Radden Keefe had this below, to say about the worlds biggest “legal” drug pusher, Raymond Sackler. I have highlighted the CIA era connection to brain experiments and criminal deviance that psychopathically masks itself as good intentioned :

He was a polymath. He was incredibly brilliant. He worked at an insane asylum in Queens, New York. And he had a notion that someday there might be a pill that could help people who were psychotic or schizophrenic, who had other afflictions.

And so he became very much a proponent of pharmaceutical innovation, of drugs, but then also of advertising, pharmaceutical advertising. And many people credit him with really being the father of pharmaceutical advertising in the United States.

Pharmaceutical advertising and there online gangs of stalkers are very prominent and identifiable in the dialectic. Equally, it is this mega-industry, backed by the junk science of psychology* that is behind those clever buzzwords and catch phrases that you read online too, like:

-you must be delusional

-tinfoil hat

-are you on your meds?

-you must be hearing voices

-the little voice in your head

Related Reading: Joy Reid calls anti-maskers “irrational,” which is just another psychiatric term.

All of these terms can be researched, linked to the drug companies, and other affiliated industries, and verified as part of a media campaign, as we see all of that in the gang stalking dialectic.

But what is harder to do is to actually make the case that there is in fact a “mafia” involved, because so much of the last century, the very same advertising forces waged a public relations campaign convincing the world that”the mafia” was the various Italian mobs portrayed in film and television, with occasional looks at the Irish mobs, and very very rarely–and then only in a flattering manner as we see above–portraying the Jewish mobs, which is a whole novel for anyone interested.

Everyone who writes about the Sackler Family, and Purdue Pharma does so in an almost flattering manner too, failing to call their activity what it is–organized crime that walks the line between drug dealing and “distributing medicine,” using billions of advertising dollars and complicit media outlets, ranging from universities and research fellows, to actual media.

Even then, the closest they come is to call that crime family “secretive,”which is akin to calling the Protestant colonial powers or the Catholic church and their atrocities to “misunderstood humanitarian efforts.” Same goes for Al Capone and his famous soup kitchen too. SO, one tribes gangster is another tribes philanthropist, just as one tribes bankster is another tribes gangster.

But these medical mafia’s exist, and they have zero concern for the well being of children, rather having structured entire dialectics to conceal their ill intentions, and the various children for profit schemes they have perpetrated, which are numerous. They are involved in crafting every single narrative of “health,” since the early days of Kellogg’s breakfast cereal, which was invented by a Seventh Day Adventist who wanted to murder peoples sex drive, and Edward Bernays getting women hooked on smoking–its just exploitation by another name, playing a much larger, and despicable game.

Wherever you look, religious and tribal narrative is behind the most bizarre schemes and the public relations campaigns that surround them. And, the same is true of gang stalking–these crime rings don’t just “love children,” in fact, sometimes they “love the children to near death experiences,” exactly the way they did to little Christopher Bowen.

The question is, though: when will those doctors who did those surgeries see a trial or a jail cell for sacrificing the best eight years of little Christopher’s life on the altar of “looking the other way when the Munchhausen’s mommy** and her state paid medical card lands at your office billing desk?

Its endemic, systemic criminality, unchecked.

*Psychology is not a “hard science” in any way, and most of what passes for “science” in the field is just validation, and cross validation of one another’s opinions, with scant proof anywhere about anything. The proof of that as a statement is that psychological diagnoses cannot be replicated across human cultures in any scientific fashion.

While many cases of :”talk therapy” and excercise programs related to depression and other “disorders” these can be equally effective no matter who reccomends them; and when we get into categories like “bi-polar,” and especially “schizophrenia” its nearly all junk science.

Worst of all is that most of the popular “diagnoses” explored in the DSM-5 come from psychologists who derive from Jewish-christian cultures, and are inherently and massively biased. An airtight argument can be made, for example, that “bi-polar” is really based in the religious concepts of “good and evil,” and written into “psychology-theology” by these biased observers.