You know the canard: extreme claims require extreme evidence. I have repeatedly made the claim that NGO’s and particularly, the umbrella organizations under the “human rights” groups are major gang stalkers, but hard to prove that they are stalking people. Human rights indeed–this woman stalked pubescent teenage boys*.
And so, this blog you are reading uses the “scientific method” to test, and re-test my scientific hypotheses, which is an entirely different scenario than “conspiracy theorizing,” because I present evidence for my claims, ask others to utilize the data, and retest the hypotheses. And so far, ROGS Analysis is batting around 1000%–you can test it yourself! I have sued them, named them, won a settlement, put a security company out of business, and more.
And, a major newspaper won an award after I began to write on this topic. But not just any award–they won the famed Pulitzer Prize, because they wrote about the topic in sanitized terminology, and pasty-white terms.
No “electronic brain zappers, lizard people, and satellite beams,” and 1000% current and former police, military, intelligence agents, and their friends, relatives and associates in the “community policing” scheme, stalking and harassing people. Here is more evidence:
Like the eBay gang of stalkers, now indicted by the fed, with many guilty pleas, and an 18 month jail term handed down to one of them–the executive “shot callers” in that case former CEO Devin Norse Wenig and public relations guru Steve Wymer are harder to prosecute in criminal court–but are indeed being sued for millions in damages in civil court.
Read It: Gang stalking cases and lawsuits, Steiner v. eBay Inc., 21-cv-11181, U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts (Boston). Notice how gang stalkers get police on board with their illegal activity. In a WhatsApp exchange, the lead conspirator used a “good cop/bad cop” approach to the local police.
“The DOJ said that [Philip]Cooke helped plan the harassment and coverup attempts. “Good plan and cover,” Cooke wrote in a WhatsApp message to co-conspirators, according to a charging document. Cooke’s message also advised fellow employees to find “a friendly” contact in the local police department and to “be convincing so [police] don’t start looking to find video of who purchased the gift cards” that eBay employees used to send the pig masks and other harassing deliveries to the Steiners. Cooke responded with two thumbs-up emojis after Gilbert wrote, “We can control the local cop and maybe provide a video from a different Santa Clara Safeway,” the court document said.”
Gang stalking is nearly 100% current and former police, etc.
The low hanging fruit in that case, a disgraced retired cop from a known gang stalking police department, and his not-so-smart team of stalkers from eBay’s ironically named “intelligence” division were a bit easier to indict, not just because they are stupid people, or that they fit the police profile to the letter, but because their plot and actual conspiracy was so transparent–so typically bizarre, as most gang stalking cases are.
But what makes these cases easier to prosecute is that their features are PREDICTABLE–and ROGS Analysis does that–it predicts features of “gang stalking.” And since my work online is helping others to understand the bizarre nature of gang stalking, who does it, and how they do it, we also see another “prediction” that I made long ago come to complete fruition in the case of Steve Wymer now heading the Boys and Girls Club’s of America, Silicon Valley branch.
Here is one part of that “prediction” based in evidence which I collected years before I wrote that–ROGS Analyses goes where the evidence takes the researcher. And other media outlets later wrote about gang stalkers and the Boys and Girls clubs too, including The Intercept.
And so again I have demonstrated repeatedly that the so-called “human rights” NGO’s are indeed affiliated with stalkers, if not directly deploying gang stalking themselves. These NGO’s are often psychopathic pushers of both policy, and people, and it helps to form a profile that includes them and their “change agents” as gangs of stalkers.
SO, the recent indictment of Ramajana Hidic Demirovic demonstrates this claim, as a baseline from which investigators can develop and pursue new profiles of “gang stalkers,” and prosecute them in court.
Let’s take a quick look at where that woman’s name appears online, and count the number of NGO affiliations that she has, or where NGO’s have used her and her story to get donations for their causes. As I said, women comprise a large portion of cyber stalkers, and gang stalkers too.
Gang stalking comes offline into real lives, and is indeed designed to make the complainant look crazy, as these people fill the internet with garbage about “Directed Energy Weapons!!! and other pollution. These “electronic weapons” are in fact, cell phones, computers, and hackers; camera’s and various surveillance gear used to infiltrate peoples lives electronically. And that’s what Ramajana Hidic Demirovic did too–she cyber stalked some young boys, and stalked them offline too, and literally stated she would “ruin their lives,” and so on–and she did do that indeed, according to the indictment.
So, let’s dif deeper into my prediction of NGO involvement. Page one of the search results for her name returns the expected stuff–her indictment, and then her Internet Movie Database (IMDB) profile, a blog called Parent Security highlighting her case–and then, our first entry locating her as an NGO afilliated person, via an entry at the page “The McCloskey Fund.”
Here’s more about that:
This fund commemorates the life and work of former Bloomington mayor, Indiana Congressman, and REEI alumnus Frank McCloskey, who dedicated himself to the advancement of peace and democracy in the Balkans. The fund supports a biennial exchange program that sends an IU student to study in the Balkans and a student or scholar from the Balkans to study in Bloomington and Washington, DC.
And of course–who finances the gang stalkers? Right after the intro blurb, a donate button that says:
Yup–that’s one funding source for gang stalkers.
And then later in the search results, another link to a different NGO, the Center for Justice and Accoutability.
SO, when investigating links between stalkers who you can name, look into their NGO affiliations too, and maybe, find a few more gang stalkers–target them, and prosecute them for what they do. And, check out other activists who are monitoring NGO’s too, because these organizations are an arm of the “deep state” in every way.
*the tradition in journalism is to avoid saying that the person DID it, but rather to say that they are “alleged to have done it.” What a quaint convention, drawn from corporate media, which ALWAYS covers their own. Yeah–feel free to sue me–but no one ever does–why is that?
Yup: ROGS Analysis is batting 1000% in identifying actual stalkers, and “gangs” of stalkers. I can’t wait to see how this one plays out. I am betting on that she cops a plea, and becomes a federal informant after that.