SO, I have pointed journalists to the partisan divide in the gang stalking dialectic, and hopefully that has aided a few to avoid stepping into the piles of doo-doo that pollute the internet on this topic. Names like Targeted Justice, and anyone affiliated with them.
Names like ” Lynn Fitch, Mississippi, State Attorney General,” and others like her. These lists are long, and very political. They form the vanguard of a gender biased narrative. They are involved with “women’s empowerment” narratives, and are financed by the Ku Klux Klan and their associates. Read more here about “women’s empowerment and the KKK.“
A refresher: these psychologists here are all direct beneficiaries of the profits derived from gang stalking–they work in the for-profit prison systems, write books about how intelligence targets like Julian Assange are all delusional–AFTER they have been tortured via surveillance, deprivation, isolation, and other horrific tactics of the US-FVEY’s security apparatus–and how prisoners who fall prey to the USA gulag system’s are delusional, after they have suffered by rape and torture, and violence in that system.
And so on–and these shrinks have been quoted in several MSM outlets as sources though they have directly harmed actual victims*; and this journalist here is the one who planted one of the most egregious hit pieces ever about gang stalking in the New York Times, quoting one or two of those same sources. Target that guy, ok? Announce “open season” on has beens like that who have burned their own reputations as journalists, via bias and fraud.
For reference, note that many in the gang stalking dialectic reference “torture” of one kind or another, which is a good starting point to begin separating the real sources from those with distinct agenda’s. But also notice that not a single one of these is on record speaking up about Guantanamo Bay Cuba, and the ongoing and actual torture there–nor did they speak up about Muslim’s in their countries being followed around “24-7,” or speak out against the Abu Ghraib torture scandal either.
There is a subset of persons who are genuine victims of state torture, and you can view one of them here, Richard Moore, who is routinely subjected to false arrests and endless harassment, including jail, where the “good police” always manage to injure him while in custody.
These actual targets are indeed tortured in many ways–and wiretapped “electronically” in so many ways that it defies the definition of democracy. But do not confuse them with those I name below–these below are scurrilous dogs, and most notably, Midge Mathis and her crew.
None of these are on record speaking out against ACTUAL torture, and all of them conflate issues–such as “domestic violence is a silent epidemic of torture!!!!” and that sex work is “sex slavery!!!.” And none of them EVER rescue the millions of men who are in western countries as undocumented workers, and who labor silently in the various roles of farm workers, restaurant workers, construction workers, and other high risk laborers. No–these sources below are silent about that.
So, for a reference point, first lets meet one of many of us who do not use the language of “electronic torture!” and “satellite microwave brain blasters!” and so on who DOES document torture: Jason Leopold is a one man Freedom of Information Act factory, and he has made the military industrial complex quite uncomfortable with his journalism. He writes about actual victims of torture, such as the Guantanamo Bay mind control and torture facility. He is a an excellent source on the issues of actual torture, having brought the architects of the US CIA Torture programs into the limelight.
Leopold was responsible for the first ever interview with the Mormon bishops, James Mitchell and Bruce Jessen who green-lighted the US torture programs. As such, you can compare that discussion of torure with the religious crackpots below, all of whom are on record yammering about aliens, lizard people and brain blasting microwaves.
I have researched this topic for two decades, and have found some recurring patterns. Researchers and journalists who seek information on this topic would do well to take note of the following names, but also–go over to their linked in pages, and look at the “people also viewed” sections, where you can flesh out their allegiances and alliances more clearly.
So–who are these crackpots online? Let’s start with Derrick Robinson. He is affiliated with Apocryphal christianity–the same groups of people who burned witches back in the 16-1700’s. Click that link to open a can of worms, and psychobabble.
Then, have a look at one of those who are affiliated in this rather large network of people who all have discredited actual targeted individuals.
Approximately 90% of them are white, affluent, affiliated with hard right christians, and babble on and on with claims of “electronic harassment” for which they NEVER present evidence of any knd. THese are also behind the pollution of the internet on this topic.
- John Richmond-Partner, Dentons | Former U.S. Ambassador to Monitor & Combat Trafficking in Persons
There are ambassadors, and former state department heads all over the map in this dialectic of “craziness” and all of those have ties to the “deep state” apparatus (NSA/CIA/NED, et al). The dialectic itself a form of religious proselytization.
- Here is US Ambasador Mark Green, who is also tied to them. He is the Executive Director at the McCain Institute,
These crackpots pop up everywhere together–an ultra-conservative, religious group, who has conflated sex work with slavery, and domestic violence with terrorism at every junction.
- Here is Midge Mathis, one of the more bizarre narratives online. She likes to post pictures of herself with her eyes “lasered out by electronic radio waves” and so on. However, further investigation reveals that she in fact had some form of skin peel for beauty purposes, and lied about the results. SHe also goes by several different names too, and the “Midge” character is an intelligence styled cut out, much like “Eleanor White,” and “Ella Free.” Truly weird people.
She bills herself as a”Human Rights Activist For Whistleblowers & Targeted Individuals. See TargetedJustice.com” Targeted Justice of course is one of the most discredited of all narratives online–likely they are stalkers themselves.
- Then, there is DonnJoy Plattner, who is apparently affiliated with a US General, and she pops up in many discussions too, yammering on about “electronic weapons!!”
All of these form the vanguard of the modern anti-prostitution, anti-sex worker, and anti-democracy elements of the neocon agenda. Their webs of relations are scurrilously full of those who yammer on about electronic weapons, and discredit actual targets who do NOT use such terms.
Actual targets are those who these people are targeting. You can have a look at a low level sex offender here, who for all practical intents and purposes is innocent–I have said that exactly twice in my decades of covering this topic. And, I have read the guys entire trial transcripts, front to back, including his failed appeal. His own lawyer failed to have the one single piece of evidence against him fingerprinted, or DNA sampled.
Like many cases in the deep south, these actual targets are part of a massive neo-slavery systems, and are revenue collection scheme of the highest order. That one guy has the entire resources of the Department of Public Safety directed at him, including drones that follow him, caravans of cars that stalk night and day in front of his house, people firing guns off in his yard, routine false arrests,and worse.
Use my search feature “Richard Moore” to learn more about that case.
*look at the case of the New Zealand mass stabbing, where a gang of 30 police from several departments, and their “community assets” stalked a man “24-7” for half a decade, BEFORE he went on a stabbing rampage.
And even then, as he picked up a knife in a store, he was merely stabbing people who had likely stalked him. All of that happened in the same country/jurisdiction/locality as one of these named psychologists, who calls such claims “delusions.”
Her name is DR. Lorraine Sheridan, and she is a fraud who famously “interviewed the internet” to find information on this topic. Her and her colleagues refuse to accept my challenge (click the link).The internet, it might be recalled through the Gabby Petito saga, is FULL of cops, retired cops, and others in their circles who masquerade as innocent “commenters” on web forums, or what the Sun-US calls ” armchair detectives.” And they are totally full of shit on this topic..You can see there work here in the case of Gaby Petito, who died as a result of co-combatant domestic violence.