One of the classic discrediting narratives used by psychologists to decide whether to classify an individual as “delusional” is whether or not they thing that some agency like the CIA is behind their gang stalking. And as we saw with Peter Strzok and Lisa Page during the Trump prsidency, is that they were central to discrediting him–but also, that Strzok was an active dual agent of both the FBI and the CIA.
Peter Strzok worked 24 years for the CIA. His job title was Chief of their Counterespionage Group…The FBI never had such a unit. Strzok (pronounced Strock, rhymes with sock) led the FBI’s investigation into Hillary Clinton. She used personal email for classified government business while she was Secretary of State.The FBI’s investigation into Russian interference in the election of Donald J. Trump as President was also led by Strzok. A joint CIA/FBI position was created by Congress in 1996. Strzok was “a senior FBI official” by being the CIA’s Chief of Counterespionage.
Such claims of ones life being disrupted by secret police agencies can sound absurd on their face, and one of the questions that some ask–indeed, online it was asked of me–“who are you that some secret spy agency would want to harass you?!”
My answer can be found all over online about this topic, but generally, I too have relatives “in high places” who know a lot of sooper secret stuff, ranging from both Democrat to Republican dirt, George Bush and Hillary dirt, to many other sordid Washington D.C. and other jurisdictions dirty laundry. So, I have watched gang stalking since I was a child, and indeed, know what it is, and who does it, though at times the names of the actual people who you can sue change, one locality to the next.
And too, I wrote one of the nations first stories on manufactured terrorism, long before that became fashoionable. I was one of those silly idealists who thought I lived in a democracy–and that things like due process and civil liberty meant something–they don’t. What matters in thee types of democracies is power, and how one uses it, regardless of legality–its all about what one can get away with before they get caught. And even then, its a matter of having the power to get you out of a jam, should you take that route.
Myself, I opted for freedom–and freedom is “where you find it on that day” not in these legacy so-called democracies anymore, these “spook run theocracies” of the western world. I was gang stalked ever since that one story, with a small victory in between where I sued a gang of stalkers comprised of current and former police, security contractors, intelligence agents, and state workers. I prevailed in a settlement–a pittance for the damage they caused. And that until I left the USA and the gang stalking stopped, just like switchin off a light switch.
So, these cases are hard to prove–that one or another spy agency is in fact targeting a person, and that is by design–its the very central tenet of all spy work, to not get caught. And it is there where targeted individuals meet their greatest obstacle of proof. Most targeted individuals cannot name the actual asshats who are involved in this stuff, but if you use SOCMINT and OSINT, combined with free tools like these and these here, you too can trace, trap, and name your stalkers.
This problem of asshat psychologists running with the false narrative that people are delusional is gradually changing as more citizens become aware that these dark programs exist, and also, as FBI trained harassers and blackmailers are dragged into the court rooms too.
SO, the question “Is the CIA involved in my gang stalking” is something that decent psychologists must consider on a case by case basis. We see CIA/NSA/FBI whistle blower’s targeted time and again, and we also see that racial, tribal and sectarian interests in these agencies all default to discrediting of whistle blowers, like what happened to former FBI agent Terry Albury of Minnesota’s notoriously racist and corrupt FBI.
So in light of the Peter Strzok case, lets take a look at how deeply involved the CIA is with domestic dark programs in the US–dark meaning that citizens are not aware of these operations, and the inter-agency blur that has occured since 9-11-2001. And in order to bring light to the present, we must look at the past, as many wrtiters who write about gang stalking have done–lets look at Operation GLadio, part of the CIA’s plan to create a one world government in Europe after WW2.
Operation Gladio is undisputed historical fact. Gladio was part of a post-World War II program set up by the CIA and NATO supposedly to thwart future Soviet/communist invasions or influence in Italy and Western Europe. In fact, it became a state-sponsored right-wing terrorist network, involved in false flag operations and the subversion of democracy.
The existence of Gladio was confirmed and admitted by the Italian government in 1990, after a judge, Felice Casson, discovered the network in the course of his investigations into right-wing terrorism. Italian prime minister Giulio Andreotti admitted Gladio’s existence but tried to minimize its significance.
The main function of the Gladio-style groups, in the absence of Soviet invasion, seems to have been to discredit left-wing groups and politicians through the use of “the strategy of tension,” including false-flag terrorism. The strategy of tension is a concept for control and manipulation of public opinion through the use of fear, propaganda, agents provacateurs, terrorism, etc. The aim was to instill fear into the populace while framing communist and left-wing political opponents for terrorist atrocities.
Gladio and its “stay-behind” networks may be one of the most historically “accepted” or “confirmed” examples of false-flag terrorism. The documentation, the resolutions, confessions, and convictions all confirm that Gladio is much more than the media or government would have you believe—a mere “conspiracy theory.” See the State Department’s special site dedicated to dismissing “conspiracy theories,” including their page on GladioSource: Truthmove
Here’s more on Operation Gladio from WikiSpooks.
Agencies that orchestrated bombings, mass shootings and massacres, including the narrative distortions of those events in the press, political figures assasinated–very much like what we see in the US and the FVEY’s nations today, as these bizarre events take place. Yet this modern activity has not been “named” as such, because the operations are staged in the most well established so-called democracy in the world, the USA. Its as if the citizens are afraid, or otherwise complacent to the point that they will not or cannot see it, even as it happens before their very eyes.
Many have speculated that gang stalking appears to be CIA activity, yet are stymied to pin that down as a fact, because there is no eveidence–nor can there be evidence, because the CIA utilizes “strategies of tension,” and stalks, harasses, or kills those who CAN name such activity.
And that’s what many mass shooters are in fact–men who might have been able to provide a clue about what they were eduring BEFORE they went ballistic. But they are always convieniently killed during “their” rampages–very few of them survive, and of those that do? They are locked away so solidly that we will never hear their viewpoint.
The cases of Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, the Boston Marathon Bombers, demonstrates these close links to the new Operation Gladio, and both were “on the FBI radar” and had ties to the CIA–we have those facts. Here is an interesting take on that connection from another “target” whose website ISGP Studies is routinely harassed online, just as my work is too.
Any genuine caretaker of democracy eagerly awaited a trial in that case which would reveal such links, but what we got instead was a the usual claims of nashunul sekurity, and one dead, one locked away in Supermax prison for life, just like all the CIA’s handiwork–Ted Kaczinsky, the Blind Sheik, and so on.
ISGP wrote back in 2013
It’s going to be interesting to see what the public will learn during the course of the trial, because almost immediately it became clear that family members of the brothers have very peculiar backgrounds. Why not instantly get to the meat? Two uncles of the terrorist brothers, Ruslan Tsarni and Alvi Tsarnaev, were deeply tied to the CIA, Zbigniew Brzezinski, and the Chechen resistance – key elements involved in the western route of Caspian Sea oil. The CIA link of Ruslan Tsarni goes through his former father-in-law, Graham Fuller , a former vice chairman of the CIA’s National Intelligence Council and a geopolitical scholar along the lines of Zbigniew Brzezinski and Samuel Huntington. In fact, both men supported Fuller’s work  and both, along with Henry Kissinger, seem to have been Fuller’s mentors since their days at Harvard in the late 1950s, both at the Department of Government and the CIA-linked Weatherhead Center for International Affairs.  Fuller is primarily occupied with the question of how to manage the Islamic world. To illustrate, in 1999 he wrote in Le Monde Diplomatique:
Then there was the Pulse Nightclub shooter Omar Mateen, whose father is an FBI informant too. AT what point does the citizenry demand insight and democratic processes? At what point do “American’s” say enough is enough with these agecies creating terrorism? Apparently, never–because the terrorism they create furthers the religious purpose of splattering the phrase “Hopes-N-Prayers” all over these news stories.
Neither case above passes the “he acted alone” test in any way, and both cases highlight only the fact that their cases are too sensitive to handle scrutiny of any kind–the narrative must be controlled. But by whom? And I think the reader can guage that, and decide of these individuals described above were either “targets” or “insane.”
Based in my experience, and the experiences of others, a narrative is building that insanity is the sole design and property of these agencies and the anti-democratic terrorists and psycopaths within them.