As we see, the case of Aathil Samsudeen, the New Zealand mass stabber, is a 100% “manufactured terrorism” event. And the evidence for that continues to accrue–the tips are coming in, and the tips indicate that the entire event was preventable, if only the police had acted within the law, and protected the rights of a refugee.
The case as it is is tainted from beginning to end–like all of these curious “counterintelligence” cases that use “high policing” the official narrative cannot be trusted, because by the time one of these cases hits the news, it’s too late to go back and examine what led up to the event that was defined as “terorism.”
Or–is it? In journalistic terms, it’s never too late to investigate these cases, in order to arrive at facts, and derive conclusions from facts. Each case presents the investigative journalist the opportunity to uncover salient details–and in the interests of public safety, to suggest better policy.
But counterterrorism programs are not designed for that–they actively dicourage discovery, and there is a the foregone conclusion that what the authorities are doing is “correct,” and “in the publics interests” of safety and security–which they provably ARE NOT, due to the losses of life involved.
We see this distortion of facts and reality in the recent case of the FBI trained “private contractor” James Baugh, stating in court “I was only doing the bad, illegal and warrantless things that I was doing because THE FBI TRAINED ME TO DO THOSE THINGS.”
More on that one case here, and here, and here and here–a real eye opener. Reading throughthese cases reveals only one thing: the terrorists are all stalked, harassed, defamed in official reports, and endlessly surveilled for many years before they go on any kind of rampage–because they are in fact, being policed for their beliefs and ideas–not their actions. Actions are cpmpletely secondary, after the fact of having their ideas “policed” and that is antithetical to free societies.
So, for example, I have a right to say “Jewish-christian zionists are all baby bombing rapist asshats, and they deserve death! What comes around goes around.”
Or “Western democracies are no longer democracies, they are police states. Communism looks more functional–we need a revolution!”
Both statements made online will get a person flagged, and likely put under some kind of surveillance, whether from a Big Tech company, or the governments of “free” nations. While neither statement falls outside the boundaries of western concepts of “free speech,” both statements will get a person flagged, because the censors in the west–Big Tech, working hand in black glove with government–seek to deter such speech, and heva even created privacy violating platforms with which to do so, most notoriously the company Moonshot CVE, which hunts “bad words” online.
These programs were sold to governments and police agencies with the idea that they can “catch terrorists,” but in actually are integral in manufacturing them–because they first intrude on the privacy expectation of the target via “policing” their words, and then follow that up with something slightly more egregious–they “redirect” the target into online materials that they DID NOT ASK for.
THis last category of rights violations is already two layers deed: privacy violations, and then mis-direction of the internet searchers requests. THat is pretty bad already, but then they add another layer, that of imputing the searchers “intentions and motivations.” So–such counterintelligence tactics–before we can even discuss their effects–are alrady several layers into un-constitutional conduct.
These programs and those who operate them deem the speakers words a “threat” to something or other, and in the west, threats are primarily a religion based metric, and the nefarious Anti Defamation League is primarily behind such racist programs, but as usual, they hide their activity behind proxies–in the case of Moonshot, an Indian developer, named
Since I started writing about this heinous targeting practice, the internet search term “Moonsghot CVE controversy” has appeared in the auto-complete section of my search engines. This is important, because before I wrote about this program, such search automation did not occur.
Search monitoring is a key feature of public relations firms, and this is one example of what is called “brand monitoring,” where a company tries to stay on top of its critics by monitoring language critical of its products..
It is also a part of what leads to gang stalking, as we see in the case of the eBay gang of stalkers now being convicted in US courts.
Here is more about the “controversy” of using such illicit racist programs, secretly monitoring peoples thoughts and ideas online: In an effort to root out extremism and supremacism within the U.S. military, U.K.-based Moonshot CVE (Countering Violent Extremism) is monitoring web searches on military bases, flagging certain phrases deemed to be potential red flags associated with White supremacy.
This is concerning for two reasons.
First, the Biden administration is already in hot water for hopping into bed with Big Tech, monitoring social media, and deciding which types of content should be censored. Second, Moonshot CVE is only looking for one specific kind of extremism: “White supremacy.”
In their June report, Moonshot CVE revealed “1,600 indicators of interest in or engagement with White supremacism, focused specifically on anti-Black and anti-Semitic narratives being used by extremist groups.” Search phrases flagged include “George Floyd deserved to die,” “Jews will not replace us” and “the truth about black lives matter.”
So where does such monitoring end–and why is it a top-down structure, with well known racist groups like the ADL being entrusted to monitor such activity? Part of the answer is here: many Nazi’s are in fact Jews.
And “who’s behind Moonshot SVE? Why stop at White supremacy? Why not monitor for anti-police rhetoric and other extremist behaviors, as well?“
We can answer part of that question: Moonshot CEO Vidhya Ramalingam and her U.K.-based extremism analysis company are part of an Obama era push for greater power for non-white world citizens–but again, hopelessly allied with other racist groups, much as we saw in the last two centuries Protestant-British-Israel allied with the white supremacist KKK.
Its a bi-partisan effort regardless–a military grade psychological operation, not bound by law or practice, and it targets average citizens too. And that, alongside pre-existing New Zealand CVE programs to boot! Here’s more about NZ’s online CVE programs, and “how to report extremist content.“
Such programs have enabled the lowest elements of society to create a snitch culture, where anything that offends their low-culture sensibilities can be reported as “extremist content,” bringing the full weight and oppressive force of government down on individuals.Samsudeen was that individual, according to all the pre-event records in his case.
In Samsudeen’s case, they began targeting and tormenting him nearly from the day he came ashore–his ideas, his web activity, and his “beliefs” were such that he was thought to be ideologically dangerous to the Jewish-christian form of society of New Zealand–that society, it might be added, descending from the Anglican-Protestant British prison-slavery schemes that routinely genocided the native populations.
Here is NZ’s definition of violent extremism: “Violent extremism refers to an individual or group who justifies the use of violence, or advocates for others to use violence in order to radically change the nature of government, religion or society.“
So, for example–if I say ” I hope that someone kicks New Zealand’s government in the face, and knocks the CVE tormentors out of their jobs to overthrow the Jewish=christian hegemony and its bullshit definitions of what is and isn’t “radical,”–I myself can be classified as a “violent extremist,” according to that law. SO please–report me immediately, I encourage you.
So, lets again look at how these elements all conspired–in the literal sense of conspiracy–to occlude Samsudeens hope for justice of any kind. Here’s a post event headline:
And what “extremist material” did Samsudeen possess? He “was found possessing a series of images which depict extreme violence, cruelty, death and graphic war scenes.”
What a strange thing to be jailed for! Because in an era where western “democrqacies” are bombing and burning all over the non-white world, news media has largely all agreed to not show the carnage–to act as if it isn’t happening.
Then, men like Samsudeen are being asked–indeed being forced–to not notice it, even of they find it online. They are being instructed to look the other way, and ignore who it is exactly who is doing te carnage creation! In that light, Samsudeen was said to be an “ISIS sympathizer,” whatever that means–and it really means nothing. Because ISIS is a western inteligence agency creation to begin with.
SO, in New Zealand, I could be put before a judge for posting this first image but not likely the second image of the Australian genocide in action:
Well–you get the idea–manufactured terrorism is NOT about the actions of any one individual, but rather, can western intelligence agencies confirm their biases by creating terrorists, which is the real issue.
And here below is one sources opinion on how they do that
1) I can’t confirm 100% it was the Mob, it could have been the Crips NZ branch lackeys since they are one of the most violent prison gangs in this country not biggest, but right after the mosque shootings that killed 50 Muslims by that psychotic Neo-Nazi in Christchurch before my country turned into a police state, the Mongrel Mob with many other gangs helped the Muslim local community and comforted them, they don’t hate Muslims!
2) The thugs that smashed him up were likely paid Weed or Smokes by a pissed off jail guard or the dirty cops or NZ SIS, with maybe a reduced sentence, there was no hit on him , he would be dead, he was intimated through violence coz they were paid I believe. In a maximum security prison, I would have done the same thing just to cope with that kind of isolation, these thugs would have been very, very most ruthless of them all full members. But maybe these guys could have been middle men/loose associates/lone wolf crims who robbed a few places, stole a few cars, who have dealings with the Mob/Crips/Rebels or other Gangs for recruitment or protection I believe who are not full members may have done this and smashed him up so there could be no evidence which crew conspired it and did it to him…..
3) I believe so because this government lobbied the Mob 2 Million dollars trying to ”Help them with Meth addictions”, this is how fucked this country is as well as the politicians being heavily lobbied by China. And the Mob and losing ground due to having beef with some of the Ozzy 501 gangs like the Mongols, that’s why a lot of their of branches are teaming up with Black Power. Gang violence has gotten pretty bad here.
4) Since John Key, this country has gotten so corrupt. But this was 100% dirty cops and the SIS. The Auckland region has the most crooked cops of them all in this country. The inmates just wanted those smokes after hours and hours of isolation past those life long sentences.
This is coming from someone who’s studied a lot about gangsters and NZ crime for a hobby. I have no beef with these gangs I am just saying the truth but 100% beef with these dirty cops who slandered me, and this crooked justice system and government and NATO-Five Eyes-Rothchild-Rockafella Demonic Filth who sacrifice kids and take money from the Banks and Big Oil and from the CCP for doing this cruel surveillance Nazi MK-Ultra shit on me and many of us. The Mob and other gangs who are the informants are mostly Ex-Convicts on parole, new recruit wannabes/kids who had nothin better to do or the gang members sons.