We saw how powerful the “missing white female” lobbyists are in the case of Gabby Petito, whose case was chronicled everywhere and everywhere media can be purchased. The case took place during the run-up to “domestic violence awareness month,” and was a media “herd-control” event that spotlighted the inherent racism of those who uphold the white women in distress narratives, while completely dismissing the fact that Petito was the aggressor in a co-combatant situation.
The entire spectacle seemed like a Lifetime movie, with more people than is logically possible following the couple across the country, snapping pictures of them along the journey. They were filmed on police body cam in Moab Utah, duking it out, while yet another camera, a female park ranger’s body cam footage was NOT released to the public; and again near Petito’s final resting place too, were a curious “van life” couple filming their vehicle–it’s as if the couple were being followed, every step of the way–because they were. This is what the domestic violence advocates and their weaponized “gangs” DO.
But what about other white females, who aren’t petite little Petito’s? Women who are not beating up some guy to force him to marry her? I bet you haven’t even herd of Naomi Irion, missing since March 12th, 2022. Her body was found yesterday, in a rural grave, and the suspect is in custody. Her family is predictably traumatized by the worst news anyone could ever get.
But maybe, there is worse news: for those whose children aren’t cherished, and for those who lose children to the predatory mechanisms of the DVIC; for those whose children aren’t pretty enough, slim enough, white enough–you haven’t heard of Naomi Irion because she doesn’t fit the profile that the Domestic Violence Industrial Complex (DVIC wants you to see in order to sell their services and narratives to you, which is a major problem in western nations and specifically in America.
To give you an idea–a scientific measure–of how powerful the domestic violence industrial complex and its white knightery is, let’s compare internet search results for these two cases of missing women
Let’s do a simple name search in a common search engine:
Gabby Petito: 8,830,000 results
Naomi Irion: 393,000 results
Then, let’s do an advanced search using the term news:
Gabby Petito news: 6,870,000 results
Naomi Irion news: 370,000 results
We see a substantial drop in results for Petito when we search for news–and that could indicate that accessory media, like blogs, Twitter, Facebook, etc. have formed the critical mass to publicize that one case, and the 13% drop indicates that, whereas in the case of Naomi Irion, the drop is about 11% and so, the difference is not that significant.
So–what is the real difference? Why was Gabby Petito’s case amplified so loudly? The answer is, like the herd-control strategy of the movie “Titanic*,” it had a lot of help as a social narrative where myth and fact collided to become something else entirely–and cover up other inconvenient facts, like that Gabby Petito was the aggressor in a mutual co-combatant situation, even admitting on camera that she frequently abused Brian Laundrie.
And, it happened during Domestic Violence Awareness Month, and all of those who benefit from that public relations campaign were “in on it” amplifying that message–the message that men are abusers, and women are victims of men, rather than as we saw in the Petito case, the fact that women not only initiate MORE violence, but that men react badly to co-combatant violence directed at them.
SO–why the discrepancy in narratives? The answer is an unsurprising “because white knights and chivalry” are behind such narratives, as is the sexual and gender based bias that describes women’s violence as harmless.
We see white knightery in action EVERYWHERE in the gang stalking dialectic. Here, some Protestants form gangs, and target men, and also we see that the very foundation of white feminism has ties to the Ku Klux Klan too.So, the DVIC is essentially a white supremacist creation–and President Joe Biden famously enshrined the gender bias of that narrative when he created the Violence Against Women Act(VAWA).
SO–make no mistake about it–Naomi Irion wasn’t “white enough” or pretty enough to defend. The armies of “websleuths” and armchair pundits didn’t pick up her case like they did that of Petito. And the web search results indicate there is evidence for that claim.
Here are the two women, side by side for comparison:
The simple fact is that the pretty white girl gets these web sleuths aroused–that they fantasize about these women and girls more than they fantasize about other girls and women; and that men who go missing barely arouse their desire to help in any way.
And that’s not an unsubstantiated claim–in fact, one of the leading cheerleaders who advisesthe targeting of stalkers–and in fact advisor to many stalking groups–is one former Scotland Yard detective Hamish Brown, who made a career targeting stalkers. Not only is he a literal stalker by trade and the definition of stalking, but he advises and gives lectures to many high level groups such as the FBI in his tactical approach to targeting. He is also a Member of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire, the third highest award given by the Queen.
None of that is to single out this one official stalker, or to infer that pursuing stalkers doesn’t have a legitimate social purpose–but it is merely to note that the guy is an actual “knight” of sorts who was given one of Britains highest honors for upholding the chivalric codes, and targeting ONLY men. Nothing in what he writes or advises addresses female to male violence or stalking; and in one of the cases at hand, Petito was herself a violent person.
That’s not insignificant–because men are MAJOR targets of many heinous, violent social practices, and these “white knights” willingly and deliberately contribute to those practices, and the murders, suicides, incarcerations and so on that accompany them. This recent case in point was the false conviction of a man who did a 40-year stretch in prison because a white woman–Alice Sebolds, author of “The Lovely Bones” and what is termed “police pornography”–falsely identified the man as her rapist–and in white woman fashion, blamed “the system” for her “little mistake.”
SO, what we are dealing with when we look into the psyche of gang stalkers is peculiar forms of mental illness or mental disrders. Here is a short list:
- Voyeurism, a sexual paraphilia. The term ‘Voyeurism’ refers to the desire to spy on unsuspecting and nonconsenting people during their private activities. Voyeuristic Disorder belongs to a group of mental conditions under paraphilic disorders in the American Psychiatric Association’s DSM 5. Persons exhibiting such conditions engage in voyeuristic activities anonymously. According to DSM 5, the most common symptoms of Voyeuristic Disorder are experiencing intense sexual fantasies and urges or getting sexual gratification from watching a person naked with or without the consent of the target
- Bias towards heterosexual proclivities, and against LGBTQ-munities. In the cases above, we see that one of the missing women could be deemed more “attractive” by white, heteronormative standards. And, we see that one was killed while fighting with her boyfriend, and after she assaulted that boyfriend, whereas the other was minding her own business as she was kidnapped by a stranger.
- Aggressive personality disorders, according to the aggression frustration model put forwards by Berkowitz (.pdf here), where frustration leads to aggression. This is more than evident in the case of a “gang” of “stalkers” many of whom are affiliated with police, stalking Richard Moore in Mississippi, which I documented as such, and also which is evident in the junk science of Adam Lankford, who irresponsibly assisted this same DVIC narration when he suggested that mass shooters are motivated by frustration, rather than retaliating at those who stalk and harass them, and who also “frustrate” these men’s ability to even gain employment.The aggressive personalities can be seen in both male and female subjects and “Not all of the aggressive personalities engage in criminal behavior, but all pose problems for relationships and society.“
- Sociopathy It cannot be missed that the victims of gang stalkers (and web sleuths and their associated “gangs”) report sociopathic behaviors directed at them by these mobs. Such sociopathy expresses itself as hacking people’s computers and cell phones, car collisions, breaking and entering people’s homes without a legal warrant, and much more. Again, the case of Richard Moore provides that evidence–but thousands of other cases too, notably the case of the New Zealand mass stabber, who went on a stabbing rampage ONLY AFTER he was jailed without access to “rights” that are enshrined in New Zealands constitution–then released, re-jailed, and finally, literally stalked by a force of 30 police, 24 hours per day, seven days per week, over a 53 day period.
So, what we see in the case of missing girls and women is in fact, “white knightery” in action–and all the sexual and gender based angst and frustration that we might expect to see expressed in a variety of sublimated ways. A simple glance at the two images of two different missing women gives us one example–but there are thousands more online.
And none of that angst brought Naomi Irion or Gabby Petito home any sooner, or assisted in locating her BEFORE she was murdered. In a word–these web sleuths, and all of their narrative serves little function for “saving” damsels in distress, but EVERY function of perpetuating false narratives of women in trouble–and that is what it is designed to do, it is the very underlying narrative of this form of culture.
And that is not to absolve women in such a narrative either, because so many women are gang stalkers too. Lesbian’s and others have filled the ranks of policing and its associated industries for well over 30 years now. But the women who work in that industry still lean towards a desire to be “protected” both as women, and as a class of people who benefit from this double standard.
And maybe–that’s the exact problem we see in this duality, right there: how WOMEN perform the function of gender bias, lookism, and the associated hydra’s that go with them.
*Titanic, the movie, was one of the most blatant herd control mechanisms of the last several decades, with teen girls and women swooning to the idea that they need not ever be held accountable for their actions, as long as they get the baby out of some stooge. Predictably, the end of the film has the central figure throwing a pendant worth several hundred million dollars into the ocean–a message that is as destructive as it is stupid. So, no small surprise that it is also quite likely the sinking of the real Titanic was likely the largest insurance fraud of its era.